RESUMO
The past decade has seen human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing emerge as a remarkably popular test for the diagnostic work-up of coeliac disease with high patient acceptance. Although limited in its positive predictive value for coeliac disease, the strong disease association with specific HLA genes imparts exceptional negative predictive value to HLA typing, enabling a negative result to exclude coeliac disease confidently. In response to mounting evidence that the clinical use and interpretation of HLA typing often deviates from best practice, this article outlines an evidence-based approach to guide clinically appropriate use of HLA typing, and establishes a reporting template for pathology providers to improve communication of results.
Assuntos
Doença Celíaca/epidemiologia , Doença Celíaca/genética , Antígenos HLA/genética , Teste de Histocompatibilidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Australásia/epidemiologia , Doença Celíaca/sangue , Predisposição Genética para Doença/epidemiologia , Predisposição Genética para Doença/genética , Antígenos HLA/sangue , Teste de Histocompatibilidade/métodos , HumanosRESUMO
To study the agreement between three tests for aspiration, barium videofluoroscopy, salivagram, and milk scan we studied 63 children with severe non-ambulant spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (CP) aged 14 months to 16 years (32 males, 31 females). The salivagram was most frequently positive (56%, 95% confidence interval 43 to 68%); the next most frequently positive was barium videofluoroscopy when aspiration was defined as the presence of either laryngeal penetration of material or frank aspiration (39%, 95% confidence interval 26 to 53%). The milk scan was rarely positive (6%, 95% confidence interval 2 to 16%). Agreement between the tests of aspiration was poor. The maximum agreement (kappa=0.20) was between aspiration as diagnosed with the salivagram and by barium videofluoroscopy. Positive tests for aspiration are frequent in children with severe CP. Frequency varies widely depending on the investigation used. There is poor agreement between tests used for the diagnosis of aspiration. This information is of importance in assessing the significance of test results.
